<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Windows-Xp on Michele Bologna</title>
    <link>https://www.michelebologna.net/tags/windows-xp/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Windows-Xp on Michele Bologna</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://www.michelebologna.net/tags/windows-xp/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Come terminare nel modo corretto explorer.exe su Windows XP</title>
      <link>https://www.michelebologna.net/2008/come-terminare-nel-modo-corretto-explorerexe-su-windows-xp/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.michelebologna.net/2008/come-terminare-nel-modo-corretto-explorerexe-su-windows-xp/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;**&lt;a href=&#34;https://www.michelebologna.net/images/2008/02/image4.png&#34; &gt;&lt;img src=&#34;https://www.michelebologna.net/images/2008/02/image-thumb4.png&#34; alt=&#34;image&#34;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;**Oggi avevo bisogno di riavviare il processo explorer.exe di Windows. Avrei potuto aprire il Task Manager e fare un kill del processo explorer.exe, ma non mi sembrava la soluzione giusta per terminarlo correttamente. Così, ho cercato in giro: la soluzione corretta (Windows XP):&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Windows Vista è più sicuro di Windows XP?</title>
      <link>https://www.michelebologna.net/2007/windows-vista-e-piu-sicuro-di-windows-xp/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://www.michelebologna.net/2007/windows-vista-e-piu-sicuro-di-windows-xp/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Vista&#34;  class=&#34;external-link&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&gt;Windows Vista&lt;/a&gt; è più sicuro di &lt;a href=&#34;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_XP&#34;  class=&#34;external-link&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&gt;Windows XP&lt;/a&gt;?&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Oggi stavo leggendo il blog di &lt;a href=&#34;https://web.archive.org/web/20090228084102/http://blogs.technet.com:80/feliciano%5Fintini/&#34;  class=&#34;external-link&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&gt;Feliciano Intini&lt;/a&gt;, che riporta un link ad un report stilato da &lt;a href=&#34;https://web.archive.org/web/20100501141312/http://blogs.technet.com:80/security/&#34;  class=&#34;external-link&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&gt;Jeff Jones&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Il report riguarda un&amp;rsquo;analisi dei primi 6 mesi di vita di Windows Vista. In particolare, su questo report troviamo un grafico molto interessante (vedi il post di Feliciano &lt;a href=&#34;https://web.archive.org/web/20081225142147/http://blogs.technet.com:80/feliciano_intini/archive/2007/06/21/I-primi-6-mesi-di-Windows-Vista-quando-i-numeri-parlano-da-soli.aspx&#34;  class=&#34;external-link&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&gt;qui&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
